Source-Sensitive Belief Change
نویسنده
چکیده
The AGM model is the most remarkable framework for modeling belief revision. However, it is not perfect in all aspects. Paraconsistent belief revision, multi-agent belief revision and non-prioritized belief revision are three different extensions to AGM to address three important criticisms applied to it. In this article, we propose a framework based on AGM that takes a position in each of these categories. Also, we discuss some features of our framework and study the satisfiability of AGM postulates in this new context.
منابع مشابه
Trust-based belief change
We propose a modal logic that supports reasoning about trust-based belief change. The term trust-based belief change refers to belief change that depends on the degree of trust the receiver has in the source of information.
متن کامل(Dis)Belief Change Based on Messages Processing
This paper focuses on the features of belief change when agents have to consider information received from other agents. We focus on belief change operators when agents have to process messages about a static world. We propose to consider agents’ belief state as a set of pairs 〈belief, origin of the belief〉 combined with a preference relation over the agents embedded in the multi-agent system. ...
متن کاملHow MESSAGE EVALUATION AND SOURCE ATTRIBUTES MAYINTLUENCE CREDIBILÜY ASSESSMENT AND BEUET CHANGE
J&MC Quarterly Vol. 73, No. 4 Winter 1996 974-99J m997AEJMC Although source credibility's importance in communication, particularly in persuasion, is well documented, audience processes in assessing source credibility and the resulting impact are inadequately specified. We hypothesize message quality will have direct effects and mediate partially the effects of initial credibility assessments o...
متن کاملBelief Expansion, Contextual Fit, and the Reliability of Information Sources
We develop a probabilistic criterion for belief expansion that is sensitive to the degree of contextual fit of the new information to our belief set as well as to the reliability of our information source. We contrast our approach with the success postulate in AGM-style belief revision and show how the idealizations in our approach can be relaxed by invoking Bayesian-Network models. ∗A slightly...
متن کاملA system for consistency preserving belief change
We present a dynamic doxastic logic which formalizes belief change for rational agents. It is based on the multi-agent modal logic KD45n, and therefore preserves the consistency of belief. The actions can be seen as announcements of arbitrary formulas to arbitrary groups of agents. We call it pure belief change because there is no change of propositional facts. We give a sound and complete axio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1704.03396 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017